Antelope Cave (USA): 1,200-Year-Old Pouches Found Contain Prehistoric ‘Chewing Tobacco’

Blake De Pastino

Source -

Dozens of small, fiber-wrapped bundles discovered in a cave in Arizona have been found to contain wild tobacco, the first scientific evidence suggesting that Ancestral Puebloans of the prehistoric Southwest chewed tobacco for personal use, archaeologists say.

Pueblo tobacco quidsArchaeologists recovered 345 fiber-wrapped bundles, known as quids, from Antelope Cave in northern Arizona. (Photo courtesy T. Murphy)

Such chewed bundles, known as quids, have been found throughout the Southwest, from Texas to California, often with teeth marks still visible. But what they contained, and what purpose they served, was uncertain until now.

As wads of fibers, perhaps they haven’t produced as much excitement as they could have, before we realized ancient folks were actually putting substances inside them,” said Dr. Karen Adams of the Crow Canyon Archaeological Center, who led the new study.

Before we took this close look, I think prior explanations centered around ancient people sucking on quids during times of food stress, maybe to get some minor amounts of nutrients out of them.

There have been a host of other suggestions for quid usage, too … such as ‘tea bags,’ dye bundles, and wash pads.”

The Arizona quids were originally excavated in the 1950s from a trash midden at the rear of Antelope Cave, a rocky enclave filled with artifacts left by Ancestral Puebloans over an extended period around 1,200 years ago.

Antelope cave middenBLM archaeologist Kyle Voyles investigates the midden deposit in Antelope Cave in July 2008. Cast-off trash of the cave’s inhabitants some 1,200 years ago have provided a wealth of information about an early phase of Ancestral Puebloans sometimes referred to as the Virgin Anasazi. (Photo courtesy K. Johnson)

The cave contained a wealth of materials such as arrows, basketry, and feathered ornaments, giving researchers unprecedented insights into an early phase of Puebloan culture sometimes referred to as the Virgin Anasazi.

But the quids remained unstudied, languishing in museum storage for half a century, until Keith Johnson of California State University, Chico, and his colleagues, took a closer look.

Johnson recalled taking note of the quids when he catalogued Antelope Cave’s artifacts for what would become UCLA’s Fowler Museum of Cultural History in 1960.

We thought even then that some [of the quids] might include tobacco and noted this in the catalog,” he said.

More than 50 years later, as I began to describe and analyze the quids as part of a broader study of the materials from Antelope Cave, I found that most of the quids in the collection contained tiny plant fragments.

Not being a botanist, I turned to Karen for help.”

A total of 345 quids had been recovered from the cave, all but one of which were found in its midden of cast-off trash.

This suggested to the archaeologists that the quids were used informally by the cave’s inhabitants, rather than for ceremonial purposes.

To determine what they held and how they were made, the team first analyzed the plant material inside 30 of the quids, and compared it with wild plant specimens cataloged in the University of Arizona Herbarium.

Based on the anatomy of stems, leaves, seeds and other parts, the plants found in 27 of the 30 matched the genus of wild tobacco plants known as Nicotiana.

Nicotiana attenuataDNA analysis of six of the Antelope Cave quids found that they contained the leaves, stems, and seeds of Nicotiana attenuata, also known as coyote tobacco, a potent form of wild tobacco that still grows in the area near the cave. (Photo by K. Groten)

To further refine the results, Dr. Terry Murphy of the University of California at Davis then conducted DNA tests on a selection of the quids.

He first analyzed the fibrous covers of 10 samples and found them to have been made from yucca leaves.

Then, in a subsequent study of 6 additional quids, results showed that their contents were specificallyNicotiana attenuata, or coyote tobacco, a species of wild tobacco that still grows in the area around the cave.

Reporting their findings in the Journal of Field Archaeology, the team writes that their combined evidence suggests the quids were simply a common way for Ancestral Puebloans to ingest potent wild tobacco as a stimulant, in a manner similar to the use of modern chewing tobacco.

We believe that yucca leaf quids containing wild tobacco were sucked and/or chewed primarily for pleasure and the stimulant effect they brought to the individuals who inhabited Antelope Cave over hundreds of years,” they write.

Just like smokeless tobacco — snuff, chews, plugs, etc. — in today’s modern world, ancient tobacco sucked through quids could become addictive and may have been used regularly at Antelope Cave.”

n an interview, Adams added that her team’s methods brought scientific rigor to a subject that for decades had only been a topic of speculation.

This study is among the first to utilize a molecular biology approach to identification of ancient plant materials in the U.S. Southwest,” she said.

So, essentially, we have provided evidence of how we know what we know.

This is scientific in the sense of being repeatable. And we have provided a perspective that suggests we have perhaps underestimated or underappreciated the stories quids have to tell.”

And yet, she pointed out, her team tested fewer than 10 percent of the quids originally discovered at Antelope Cave, and two of those contained plant material that could not be identified.

So the small fibrous bundles may hold still more new clues to the lifeways of the Virgin Anasazi.

We don’t imply that all quids at Antelope Cave — or elsewhere for that matter — would be the same,” Adams said.

Who knows what other surprising inclusions there might be in the hundreds of quids curated inside museums?”

Adams, K., Johnson, K., & Murphy, T. (2015). Prehistoric Puebloan yucca quids with wild tobacco contents: Molecular and morphological evidence from Antelope Cave, northwestern Arizona
Journal of Field Archaeology, 40 (3), 310-324 DOI: 10.1179/2042458214Y.0000000006